Mackall, Crounse & Moore, PLC has joined Dewitt Ross & Stevens S.C.

The newly formed DeWitt Mackall Crounse & Moore S.C. will provide clients with enhanced legal services
and efficiencies as well as access to more than 100 attorneys practicing in nearly 30 areas of
law in Wisconsin and Minnesota.

Dismiss this message


News & Education

Back to Employment Law News Feed

Filter by:

To Pay or Not to Pay: What Counts as Time Worked Under the FLSA

Employers frequently struggle to determine whether they must pay workers for time spent at the beginning and the end of the work day. I am happy to report some good news for employers in this area. The Supreme Court unanimously ruled on December 9, 2014 that the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) does not require employers to pay employees for time spent waiting to undergo and undergoing security screenings. While many employers do not screen their employees after each shift, the reasoning used by the Supreme Court can be used in other contexts to determine whether time is compensable under federal laws.

The decision, Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk, is important for all employers because it is helpful in applying the “integral and indispensable” test. The test is used to determine the compensability of activities that do not qualify as principal activities of an employee. The “integral and indispensable” test says that an activity is “‘integral and indispensable’ if it is an intrinsic element of the employee’s principal activities and one with which the employee cannot dispense if he is to perform his principal activities.” Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk, No. 13-433, 2014 WL 6885951, at *5 (U.S. Dec. 9, 2014)

The case involved employees of Integrity Staffing Solutions who packaged products at an Amazon warehouse. The employees were required to undergo security screenings after each shift to prevent employee theft. The screening process took roughly 25 minutes per day. The plaintiffs argued that the time should be compensable because the employer required the post-shift screenings for the employer’s benefit.

The Supreme Court rejected the plaintiffs’ argument because it was inconsistent with Congress’ amendment of the FLSA in the Portal-to-Portal Act, which narrowed the scope of compensable work. The Portal-to-Portal Act exempts from compensation activities that are done before or after the principal activities that the employee is employed to perform. The court reasoned that the security screenings were not integral and indispensable to the employee’s main warehouse duties, and thus, not compensable under the FLSA. The employees were employed to package products for shipment, not to undergo security screenings. The security screenings were not part of the employees’ principle duties and were exempted from compensation under the FLSA. The Supreme Court was not persuaded by the fact that the employer required the employees to undergo the security screenings. The fact that an employer requires an activity is not enough to make it compensable. The Supreme Court held that more is required.

The Supreme Court’s decision is not the end of this issue. Determining what counts as time worked under state and federal laws continues to present unique challenges for employers. The Supreme Court’s decision will help employers determine what counts as time worked under federal laws, but provides no help with respect to state laws. Wisconsin laws are similar to federal laws in this area. However, Wisconsin laws are very protective of employee rights. It is an open question whether a Wisconsin court would find similarly if presented with the same issue. If there is ever a doubt about proper compensation, it is a good idea to consult your DeWitt attorney.

About the Author

Jordan Rohlfing is an attorney in DeWitt’s Litigation and Labor & Employment Relations practice groups. She is dedicated to providing top-quality legal services for all of her clients. Working with partners at DeWitt, Jordan has assisted with post-employment restrictive covenant disputes, civil litigation, breach of contract cases, real estate transactions, as well as employment law matters.

Jordan has experience advising companies on employment issues from hiring to termination and defending those companies when disputes arise. She helps advise companies on compliant policies and procedures under Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act (WFEA), the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), and many other federal and state laws.

Contact Jordan by email or phone at (608) 283-5509.


One of the best features about our website articles and blog entries is that they are timely—you get up-to-date information on the law as it exists at the time. The downside is that the law changes, but our older entries don't. That means we can't guarantee you are getting the most current law when reading through past entries.

Please don't take these articles and blog entries and rely on them as legal advice. Give us a call instead, for specific and pointed advice for your particular situation. Note that contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship, unless you are accepted as a client of the firm.

Our Locations

Closed to outside visitors.
There may be emergency
exceptions to this measure
and our attorneys will actively
coordinate those situations
directly with our clients.  


2 East Mifflin Street, Suite 600
Madison, WI 53703
(608) 255-8891
Get Directions

Greater Milwaukee

13845 Bishop’s Drive, Suite 300
Brookfield, WI 53005
(262) 754-2840
Get Directions


2100 AT&T Tower,
901 Marquette Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 305-1400
Get Directions

Get to know us

DeWitt LLP is one of the ten largest law firms based in Wisconsin, with an additional presence in Minnesota. It has nearly 140 attorneys practicing in Madison, Metropolitan Milwaukee and Minneapolis in over 30 legal practice areas, and has the experience to service clients of all scopes and sizes.

Our People
Our Law Firm
Areas of Expertise
News & Education
Contact Us


We are an active and proud member of Lexwork International, an association of mid-sized independent law firms in major cities located throughout the Americas, Europe and Asia and an active member of SCG Legal, an association of more than 140 independent law firms serving businesses in all 50 state capitals and major commercial centers around the world.


Best Lawyers 2013 – 2018
Compass Award 2012
Top 100 Lawyers: National Trial Lawyers Association

  • blf-badge-2016
  • blf-badge-2017
  • Ramac Member Logo
  • blf-badge-2018
  • BLF-Badge-2019


While we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you (an “engagement letter”). You will not be a client of the firm until you receive such an engagement letter.

The best way for you to initiate a possible representation is to call DeWitt LLP at 608-255-8891. We will make every effort to put you in touch with a lawyer suited to handle your matter. When you receive an engagement letter from one of our lawyers, you will be our client and we may exchange information freely.

Please click the “OK” button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.