Mackall, Crounse & Moore, PLC has joined Dewitt Ross & Stevens S.C.

The newly formed DeWitt Mackall Crounse & Moore S.C. will provide clients with enhanced legal services
and efficiencies as well as access to more than 100 attorneys practicing in nearly 30 areas of
law in Wisconsin and Minnesota.

Dismiss this message


News & Education

Back to Minnesota Articles

Filter by:

Fraudster Debtors Who Think Their Home Is Their Castle Might Want To Think Again

The maxim that one’s home is their castle goes at least as far back as the English common law of 1628: “For a man’s house is his castle and each man’s home is his safest refuge.” – Sir Edward Coke. Although today this maxim may not be as literal (or politically correct) as it once was, the courts still regard one’s homestead as practically the most sacred and impenetrable asset one can own.

Some creditors might ignore a debtor’s homestead – dismissing it as untouchable (“exempt”) property for debt recovery purposes – and those creditors would be correct in making that assumption under many circumstances. However, it’s worth the lender spending a little time scrutinizing the debtor’s financial situation concerning the house before it writes off a potentially lucrative source of repayment. This is especially true if the property was designated by the debtor as his or her “homestead” only recently, or the debtor’s liquidation of non-exempt property (such as a yacht) is followed by a large payment on the debtor’s home loan.

Minnesota law allows a creditor to pierce the “homestead” designation of real property if the debtor claimed a homestead exemption with actual intent to hinder or defraud creditors. Minnesota law provides an exemption for an individual’s homestead, currently, $420,000. See Minn. Stat. §§ 510.01-.02. However, under section 513.44 of the Minnesota Uniform Voidable Transactions Act (MUVTA), a debtor may not claim a homestead exemption when he or she transfers the property “with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud” creditors. See Minn. Stat. § 513.44(a)(1).

In the case Jensen v. Dietz (In re Sholdan), 217 F.3d 1006 (8th Cir. 2000), the debtor, a retired farmer 90 years of age with serious medical problems, prior to filing for bankruptcy, liquidated most of his non-exempt property and converted it into exempt property in the form of a house, which he listed in his bankruptcy petition as an exempt “homestead.” The bankruptcy court found that the debtor had converted non-exempt property to exempt property with the intent to defraud his creditors and upheld the bankruptcy trustee’s objection to the debtor’s homestead exemption. In agreeing with the bankruptcy court, the appellate court held that, although Minnesota law provides an exemption for an individual’s homestead, under MUVTA, a debtor may not claim a homestead exemption when he or she transfers (or converts non-exempt property) into the “homestead” property with actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors. This legal principal not only applies to a debtor’s fraudulent purchase of a “homestead” using non-exempt property, but also under any circumstance where a debtor liquidates non-exempt property and transfers the proceeds into a legitimate “homestead” in order to put those proceeds out of reach of creditors. These principles apply in bankruptcy and non-bankruptcy situations.

However, notwithstanding the ruling in the In re Sholdan case, and those cases that came after it, the above principles are still only applicable in fairly narrow circumstances. The courts have ruled that the mere conversion of non-exempt assets to exempt assets (e.g., liquidating one’s boat and making a payment toward the homestead mortgage) is not by itself fraudulent and is perfectly acceptable, depending upon the timing and motivation involved. However, if additional facts constituting “badges of fraud” exist that indicate the debtor has converted non-exempt assets to exempt assets with the actual intent to defraud creditors, there is legal authority standing for the principle that those converted assets can be clawed back by the creditor and applied to the delinquent debt.

Although the concept of a virtually impenetrable homestead exemption may be a long-standing bedrock principle in our system of jurisprudence, it is not without its reasonable limitations. If an unscrupulous debtor thinks he or she can exploit the homestead protection with fraudulent impunity, they should first realize that Minnesota legal precedent includes another bedrock principle stretching back to the Minnesota Supreme Court in the 1890s (Esty v. Cummings): “While the homestead right is a valuable one … it was never intended, and it should never be permitted, to operate as a vehicle for fraud and rank injustice.”

About the Author

Jack Atnip III is an experienced litigator and creditors’ rights attorney who practices in the areas of Commercial Litigation, Financial Services, Collections/Creditors’ Rights, and Bankruptcy. Contact Jack by email or at (612) 305-1501.

Our Locations

We are currently limiting the amount of outside visitors to the firm.  

Please work directly with your attorney who will coordinate any onsite visits to ensure the safety of our clients and colleagues.


2 East Mifflin Street, Suite 600
Madison, WI 53703
(608) 255-8891
Get Directions

Greater Milwaukee

13845 Bishop’s Drive, Suite 300
Brookfield, WI 53005
(262) 754-2840
Get Directions


2100 AT&T Tower,
901 Marquette Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 305-1400
Get Directions

Get to know us

DeWitt LLP is one of the ten largest law firms based in Wisconsin, with an additional presence in Minnesota. It has nearly 140 attorneys practicing in Madison, Metropolitan Milwaukee and Minneapolis in over 30 legal practice areas, and has the experience to service clients of all scopes and sizes.

Our People
Our Law Firm
Areas of Expertise
News & Education
Contact Us


We are an active and proud member of Lexwork International, an association of mid-sized independent law firms in major cities located throughout the Americas, Europe and Asia and an active member of SCG Legal, an association of more than 140 independent law firms serving businesses in all 50 state capitals and major commercial centers around the world.


Best Lawyers 2013 – 2018
Compass Award 2012
Top 100 Lawyers: National Trial Lawyers Association


While we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you (an “engagement letter”). You will not be a client of the firm until you receive such an engagement letter.

The best way for you to initiate a possible representation is to call DeWitt LLP at 608-255-8891. We will make every effort to put you in touch with a lawyer suited to handle your matter. When you receive an engagement letter from one of our lawyers, you will be our client and we may exchange information freely.

Please click the “OK” button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.